CASE PROGRAM  2009-101.1
	
		Morale and motivation in the Canzalian Credential
	
		Assessment Unit
	
		“If cloning technology was safe, available, and ethical, I’d fill my teams with workers like
	
		Cynthia,” Shane mused as he reread the meticulously researched policy paper the young
	
		woman had presented him with – ahead of deadline. Unfortunately, the majority of his team
	
		members, especially those most experienced, were much less consistent in the quantity and
	
		quality of their work.
	
		He could see one of his team leaders tearing her hair out trying to get an assessor to finish an
	
		urgent project on time. Earlier that day he’d lent a sympathetic ear to another team leader
	
		who had been embarrassed, once again, by a piece of work turned around at top speed but
	
		missing some vital information. Frustratingly, this was from a relatively new recruit, who
	
		was clearly falling into the careless work habits of some of his longer-serving colleagues.
	
		For some years, short-staffing and unrealistic deadlines had been cited as reasons for variable
	
		performance and low morale in the teams. With recent investment in new technology, a full
	
		complement of staff, longer timelines for delivery, and a long-overdue pay rise, there was no
	
		excuse. Shane urgently needed to find a way to bring the extreme variations in quality and
	
		quantity towards equilibrium.
	
		Shane was the manager of the Canzalian Credential Assessment Unit (CCAU), a cost-
	
		recovery agency employing 59 people in teams varying in size from five to 22, some highly
	
		specialised and others generalists. CCAU was responsible for ensuring that all overseas-
	
		based professionals wanting to entering Canzalia were appropriately qualified for the jobs
	
		they had applied for, and if possible to fast-track applications for urgently needed specialist
	
		positions. The CCAU assessed the compatibility of overseas qualifications to those currently
	
		offered in Canzalia. Assessors’ case loads also included handling local and overseas
	
		enquiries about possible vacancies.
	
		This case was edited by Janet Tyson, Australia and New Zealand School of Government from material originally
	
		prepared for a Master of Public Management assignment. It has been prepared for class discussion rather than to
	
		illustrate effective or ineffective treatment of a managerial situation; although names and other details have been
	
		changed it is based on a real situation.
	
		© 2009 Australia and New Zealand School of Government. Version 14-10-2009. Distributed by the Case Program,
	
		Australia and New Zealand School of Government, www.casestudies.anzsog.edu.au. Further reproduction
	
		prohibited without express permission.
	
		2
	
		The job of an assessor was a mix of knowledge-worker, desk-researcher, data-entry-operator,
	
		quality checker, customer service representative – and some would say social worker.
	
		Assessors’ activities included sorting through applications to check that all requested
	
		information was provided; verifying the authenticity of documents and the status of awarding
	
		institutions, and if possible benchmarking overseas qualifications against the Canzalian
	
		Qualifications Framework. Internal quality assurance mechanisms included having assessors
	
		peer-review each others’ decisions, training other assessors, and writing new guidelines for
	
		assessment.
	
		Many of the assessors had been with the agency since it had been established ten years
	
		earlier. Shane had been promoted to CCAU manager 18 months ago after working with the
	
		group providing business support to all the assessment teams.
	
		The current workforce was a mix of employees aged over 35, many of them “foundation”
	
		staff, and a new “Generation Y” group of “20-something” individuals, usually with at least
	
		an undergraduate degree. Shane had observed that the majority of the assessors could be
	
		grouped into one of four work styles, roughly split according to age, gender and area of
	
		specialisation.
	
		Privately, he labeled one group as “productive but careless”. This group was predominantly
	
		male and long-serving, either specialising in vocational or applied science qualifications, or
	
		working as generalists. Conversely he thought the predominantly female teaching-
	
		qualification-specialists were “conscientious but non-productive.” In the workplace, this
	
		group was horrified at the hurried, corner-cutting approaches of the more expedient males,
	
		who in turn were frustrated that the “fact-checkers” took their jobs far too seriously.
	
		To Shane’s dismay it seemed that the newer elements of the workforce were beginning to
	
		fracture along similar, less than desirable, lines of working, in particular the “Generation Y”
	
		males. The group he thought of as “fast but unfocussed” was uninspired either by research-
	
		orientated work (such as drafting assessment policy) or task-oriented core-qualification
	
		assessment work. They would gloss over inconsistencies and problems, rather than make the
	
		effort to find a robust solution – especially if the application was taking too long. But
	
		because they took short-cuts, or worked hard in spurts of activity to avoid exacerbating their
	
		boredom, they could be highly productive.
	
		The last of the four groups, “conscientious and efficient” was characterised by predominantly
	
		young well-educated females, like Cynthia, who were highly efficient even when completing
	
		sometimes laborious tasks like quality-checking teaching-related applications. They also had
	
		an aptitude for research-orientated assessment guideline work.
	
		Despite the quality assurance mechanisms in place, variability within the assessor teams
	
		inevitably led to inconsistencies. These raised doubts in the minds of the highly networked
	
		professional migrant groups, their immigration agents and other public service organisations,
	
		about the quality of the service CCAU provided. If inconsistency could not be overcome, it
	
		could threaten the existence of the unit.
	
		However efforts to even out variable quality and quantity had so far been unsuccessful. The
	
		teaching-qualification specialists were notably reluctant to take part in any new or additional
	
		3
	
		activities, including training. As seniors, they dealt with more complicated applications and
	
		assessments, being called on by others for advice. But even with such impacts on overall
	
		productivity taken into account, some of these assessors consistently failed to come close to
	
		meeting minimum output targets. Informal warnings that output needed to increase, given at
	
		mid-year performance feed-back meetings, had no effect. Assessors were quick to respond to
	
		poor results in their end-of-year performance appraisals, by initiating lengthy, energy- and
	
		morale-sapping appeals. Managers therefore tended to record assessors as “meeting
	
		expectations” regardless of performance.
	
		Suggestions for performance improvement seemed to “wash over” many of the senior male
	
		assessors, Shane reflected. “It is as if they have been conditioned over the years that quantity
	
		is all that matters – and it shows. They work as if they just want to get the job-over-and-
	
		done-with as soon as possible and preferably without having to think about it.” Even worse,
	
		they often seemed to bring emotional and subjective criteria into their decisions.
	
		Investment and improvement in working conditions
		Morale and motivation in the Canzalian Credential  代写
	
		Until very recently, many of the CCAU assessors had felt underpaid, overworked and under-
	
		resourced, and despite the weak application of performance management, neglected and
	
		unrecognised. Working conditions had been less than ideal for most of the life of the unit.
	
		Timeframes for the completion of assessment applications were short; volumes of work were
	
		consistently high, while lengthy periods of short-staffing put further pressure on morale. It
	
		was not until August 2008, long after the need had been established, that a new document
	
		database and document management system was implemented. In the race to meet output
	
		targets, professional development fell by the wayside, as did the essential work of developing
	
		new guidelines. Staff found it dispiriting to deal with angry and frustrated applicants, advised
	
		by a standard response form that their assessment would be completed within three weeks,
	
		but still waiting for an assessor to be assigned to it several months later.
		Morale and motivation in the Canzalian Credential  代写
	
		As the new document management system was being introduced, CCAU was funded to take
	
		part in a three-year international project comparing qualifications across a wide range of
	
		jurisdictions, ultimately assisting immigration authorities to further streamline applications.
	
		Foreseeing the difficulty of working on the special project and implementing new technology
	
		simultaneously, Shane had sought an extension of the timeframes under which the unit
	
		operated. Despite a number of objections from client agencies, CCAU succeeded in doubling
	
		most of the previous timeframes for completing assessments, while at the same time
	
		increasing the commitment to clients that every endeavour would be made to complete
	
		assessments by the new deadlines.
	
		In mid-2009, the assessor morale was buoyant by historical standards due to the extended
	
		timeframes, adequate staffing, the more benevolent allocation of work by the most recently
	
		recruited manager and the recent, long awaited, and unexpected pay increase the assessors
	
		received following an agency-wide job-sizing process. In theory, conditions should be ideal
	
		for Shane to motivate his staff to make a new start, and iron out some of the glaring
	
		inconsistencies in work quantity and quality. In practice, what should he do?
	
		Morale and motivation in the Canzalian Credential  代写